The man in beast
Empathy, intuitive understanding of another’s feelings, is not an ability unique to humans.
Adherents of the ‘Intelligent Design’ movement assume that morality was granted to man by God’s grace and that Christian believers were at the front of the distribution queue. This idea was expressed by Intelligent Design adherent Henk Jochemsen in a 2005 book: “For sociobiology and evolutionary ethics, it is irrefutable that altruistic behaviour is biologically perverse and pathological, because it goes against human nature. But in most cultures and major religions, true altruistic behaviour is presented as the higher ideal.”
Anyone familiar with the work of Darwin and biologist Frans de Waal knows that this is nonsense. A dead-end idea. Darwin described in detail how our moral understanding derives from social instincts that contribute significantly to the survival of the group. This is evident in many species that have to rely on collaboration, like primates, elephants and wolves.
Empathy
Experiencing empathy, knowing how someone else feels, is the basis for all moral acts. I have watched in amazement as our dog empathised with his friend, our daughter’s dog, after it had undergone an operation on his paw. Normally, they rushed around, provoking each other to wild games without end. But after the operation, our dog sniffed the other dog and remained quietly standing, staring with a concentrated look, while making peeping sounds now and again to show that he was empathising with the other’s fate. Then he very carefully began to lick the other dog’s operated paw.
If an elephant is hit by a bullet or an anaesthetic dart, the others trumpet loudly and try to help the victim up again with their trunks or by pushing against him, sometimes for hours. Help is also offered by other elephants when one is wounded accidentally, even if they are not from the same herd. Rooks seek comfort from their lifelong mates after a conflict in the colony. They act affectionate, share some food, smooth each other’s feathers and lovingly hold the other’s beak, as if they are kissing.
There are many marvellous examples of animals exhibiting true moral behaviour. In a zoo, an old, sick ape was added to a group. Because he did not understand what the keepers wanted him to do, the bonobos led him by the hand to the correct place. And when he got lost and started crying in distress, the others came to him, calmed him down and brought him back to the group. Just try to see that on the street in Amsterdam!
Moral sense
That primates have a moral sense is apparent in chimpanzees from the existence of companionship and the urge to care for a wounded fellow. Pure empathy must also have been the basis for a bonobo caring for a wounded bird. In 1966 the female gorilla Binti Jua rescued a 3-year-old boy who had fallen 6 meters into the primate enclosure in Chicago. Other species can also sacrifice themselves for humans. For example, a labrador dog in California sprang in front of his best friend and was thus bitten by a rattlesnake. Dolphins are known not only to free trapped fellows from nets, but also to save drowning humans. Empathy and altruism are aspects that form the key to human morality, but they have a long evolutionary history that is certainly not unique to man.
These few examples clearly show that the nanotechnologist, orthodox-Christian and prophet of the Dutch branch of the intelligent design movement, professor Cees Dekker, is wide of the mark when he claims morality as the exclusive domain of Christianity. He said in a 2006 interview: “Jesus said: love God above all others and your brother like yourself. That is a moral task, a law that is difficult to understand or to examine with natural science methods. And yet we can distinguish good from evil”. Intelligent design adherents apparently do not read the writings of the people they criticise. Thus, they do not have to conclude that religion did not invent the rules of morality, but simply adopted them after they had developed in the course of evolution in social animals, including man.



vrijdag 6 februari 2009, 16:10 uur
we are a damned arrogant species and very very low on the biological scale, especially those so-called believers
vrijdag 6 februari 2009, 16:36 uur
Thanks for sharing these facts with us, it confirms my personal experience with animals (other than human). I hope time will kill this religious arrogance for a better world…
maandag 9 februari 2009, 13:05 uur
ofcourse, religion has nothing to do with morality and compassion. The more religious a person is, the more rigid, rude, egoistic and fanatic he becomes. All the wars in the past and present, have their seed in religion. Religion, does teach peace and compassion however, it also teaches rigidity and a way to command supermacy over others. Compassion and morality comes naturally, even atheists and animals are compassionate.The crows, sparrows, pigeons and squirrels have community feeling and help others in time of distress. However, dogs do fight with other dogs over bones, territories..hmmmm..imitating their masters..Man?
zondag 15 februari 2009, 02:59 uur
It is a mystery, isn’t it? How man and animals fit together, how we co-evolved. In school, many years ago, I studied primatology and saw so much in apes which seemed so familiar. But we were told not to “anthropomorphize” animals and our intuitive observations were discounted. Apes were viewed as not quite dumb, but certainly not sentient.
Now, forty years later, we can accept apes as being perplexed, expressing anger, curiosity and so many familiar emotions. De Waal’s work has shown much and anyone who has ever had a parrot as a pet can confirm that emotions are not limited to mammals only. The avian research indicates with that with syntax and vocabularies there is what some are calling a pseudo-language.
It is my great hope that the unity of sentiment revealed in modern, well structured research, can lead to a more healthful interaction among us primates and between the species. We are not alone on this planet, but rather have the potential for understanding ourselves as revealed not only by other apes, but other forms of animals as well. In seeking the domination of our natural world–called for in Christian doctrine–we are blind to this and desperately seek ways to justify our destruction. But perhaps, just perhaps, in time we can see ourselves as stewards and partners. I rather think if we want to be around for the next century we have no other choice.
woensdag 9 september 2009, 11:31 uur
I think it is arrogant on the part of Darwinists to say that empathy comes from genes, no it does not, it is a trait that is learned and taught to the offspring.
Deny love and affection to human child, and they will grow into adulthood unable to express affection.
Creationists have also got it wrong to think animals are not capable of the same feelings as humans, it is an attitude of contempt for animals.